لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment over the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that when the crime of murder was set up, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for taking into consideration mitigating factors during sentencing.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
The reported recovery might be used, at the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of occurrence. The reported memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as almost nothing was discovered on account of these kinds of pointation. The place of incidence plus the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses prior to their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance can also be placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Power to levy tax also to legislate on immovable property which include tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
Let’s give attention to what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
Upholding Justice: The application from the regulation and the subsequent punishment of the guilty party supply a perception of closure and justice towards the sufferer’s family and loved types.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social check here worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf from the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Work with DCFS.
Though numerous websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s vital To guage the credibility from the source before relying on the information.
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report for the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
ten. Without touching the merits with the case of the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of yearly increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment to generally be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally recognized conviction. Read more
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them being suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)